Something that has really influenced my thinking lately has been Doug Belshaw’s book The Essential Elements of Digital Literacies. The book stems from Belshaw’s thesis exploring the topic. One of the key insights that he provides is that there is no one ‘all defining’ definition of literacy, let alone digital literacy. Rather, it is something that we co-construct based on our community and context. It is for that reason, that he uses the plural and talks about ‘literacies’.
Instead of providing an overarching definition which soon becomes hollow and meaningless, he provides eight elements to make sense of the different incidences of digital literacies. The elements are:
- Cultural – the expectations and behaviours associated with different environments, both online and off.
- Cognitive – the ability to use computational thinking in order to work through problems.
- Constructive – the appropriate use of digital tools to enable social actions.
- Communicative – sharing and engaging within the various cultural norms.
- Confident – the connecting of the dots and capitalising on different possibilities.
- Creative – this involves doing new things in new ways that somehow add value.
- Critical – the analysis of assumptions behind literacy practises
- Civic – the something being analysed
One way of thinking about at these elements is in regards to ‘mindset’ and ‘skillset’, the is a way of thinking and a way of doing. While another way is as a set of questions:
- What are the cultural expectations and behaviours associated with different environments and contexts, both online and off?
- What are the steps/workflow involved in properly understanding the problem at hand?
- How is the use of these digital tools leading to and enabling social action?
- What are the norms for sharing and engaging within this context?
- How confident are you at connecting the dots and using different digital tools?
- How are you doing new things and what value are you adding back?
- What assumptions are behind the literacy practices?
- What is the something we are actually doing and creating?
Although each of these elements are interrelated, they are not all necessarily at play in every instance of digital literacy. It is for this reason that they are ‘elements’ not a definition. What the book provides is a starting point for how to talk about digital literacies.
One take-away was that literacies have always had a close affinity with technology. Too often we associate ‘technology’ with computers or other such devices. However, as Belshaw points out, whether it be the printing press or using a pen to write, technology has always had an integral part to play in regards to composing and consuming texts.
Another take away was that digital literacies are not merely about what we do or how we do it, instead it is about why we do it. It is about going beyond what Mitchell Baker describes as ‘elegant consumption‘. Although the focus in schools is on ‘authentic’ assessment, whether it be creating a blog or producing a book, if this is not attached to a clearly defined why then we are missing the point. This is often one of the issues with incorporating technology in the classroom. Students create digital products with little reason as to why. This is where referring back to the elements can help highlight areas of improvement, a constant reminder as to ‘why’ digital literacies are important.
Here is a recording of TER Podcast Episode #42 with my review starting at 36 minutes:
I have also written a more creative ‘final chapter‘, which seems to be more me I think than Belshaw.
If you enjoy what you read here, feel free to sign up for my monthly newsletter to catch up on all things learning, edtech and storytelling.