flickr photo shared by mrkrndvs under a Creative Commons ( BY-SA ) license
A colleague queried me the other day about the differences between a 21st century learner and someone who is really good with technology. This is a bit of an age old problem about what comes first, the device or the doing done with the device, the tool for working or the actual ways of working? As I have discussed elsewhere, I believe that something is misunderstood in this argument, for in many respects, they are inseparable.
In an insightful post debunking the naïve myth that “it’s not about the tool”, +Peter Skillen makes two key points. First, that computers are a form of media through which we can think about problems in a deeper way, and secondly, tools and technology shape our society in both intended and unintended ways. Often one of the arguments made about 21st century learning is that many of the attributes are possible without the use of technology. Surely you don’t need a computer to help you think? Although this may be true, I would argue that they are significantly amplified with the use of technology.
I remember my early days of incorporating ICT into the classroom, as a part of the YVeLC, and all my focuses were on using specific tools and programs. This is a point I made in regards to the Ultranet. However, tools are better considered as a means to enhancing various skills. In themselves, the use of tools are usually inhibited to lower order thinking – build, construct, produce – but used as a catalyse, they are a means to higher order thinking. For example, one does not:
- Use iMovie to produce a trailer for a book, rather one makes a creative representation of a book involving a range of choices.
- Develop a Google Slide to provide information on a topic, rather one shares a presentation with others and opens it up for critical responses.
- Program using a Lego Mindstorm robot, rather one uses it to solve a problem based on the options and variables available.
- Record a game of soccer, rather one uses it to reflect on choice of actions and game sense.
- Write a response to a question on Edmodo, rather one uses it to reflect on what has been learnt through the act of learning.
- Compose a blog revolving around their reading, rather one uses it to engage others in conversation in order to gather different ideas and perspectives.
- Add to a brainstorm using Answergarden, rather one uses it to develop a collaborative idea about what a group may think about a question.
Although each of these tasks are engaging and important in themselves, they lack potency if they are not linked to a deeper intention.
In the end, it comes back to a question of choice. Although a student could reflect on their lesson in PE and the various choices made, recording themselves and reflecting on it afterwards not only provides a wider perspective for the person in question not possible if it is left to just them, rather it allows for a deeper sense of self-reflection, often leading to answers in a shorter amount of time. For there are many ways of travelling from point A to point B. Clearly, one could walk, but if one rode, they would get to their destination quicker, while if they drove they would get their even quicker again. Although technology and tools are not essential to learning in the 21st century, they are definitely a big part of it. I think that once we understand that there is a more effective way from getting from point A to point B, it allows us to get to start dealing with the deeper question, why are we trying to reach point B anyway, but I’ll leave that for another day.
If you enjoy what you read here, feel free to sign up for my monthly newsletter to catch up on all things learning, edtech and storytelling.
21st Century Learning is More Than Just Technology, But It’s a Big Part of It by Aaron Davis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Yes Aaron, I agree. If we are using technology to make our lessons more engaging just by the mere fact that we are using iPads, laptops, games and the like we are not using it properly. There must be a deliberate, well thought out intent and purpose for using this equipment and that links with making the learning meaningful and relevant. Its a bonus when technology is working well and allows us to get to this point more quickly.
I always have Plan B though, because if the equipment has been recently used by another class and is not functioning as it should, this can be a real time waster.
I totally agree Anne. I am going into Early Years this year and unlike Middle Years, they have netbooks in trolleys. They simply can’t be trusted for a range of reasons. I am sharing a class and was talking with my co-teacher who spoke hesitantly about the use of technology. This is not because technology does not enable us to do amazing things, but rather that it is temperamental. I have learnt to think differently about technology over time. Some of the best moments that I have had have been where I had just my iPad with a small group, but never easy.